Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.
Following Madonna’s mega successful and critically acclaimed performance at the Staples Center in Los Angeles, a wave of negativity came from little monsters and people who claim they were at the concert in the comments sections of the news agencies that gave Madonna and her show rave reviews.
There is a huge difference though. The positive reviews for the MDNA Tour actually are logically and factually based on things that happen in the show. And as good reviewers, they all mention and name a few of the amazing things that go on on stage (that’s the power of argumentation):
Things like a floating marching band, 3D visual effects, amazing dancing, amazing songs, incredible energy and stage presence, a beautiful and detailed wardrobe - the things that are part of the show and that have undeniable value and quality are always mentioned by the good reviewers in their reviews.
What do the haters say? Stuff like “the show started late”, “Oh, that is so disrespectful”, or “Madonna didn’t sing enough old songs”. When they do realize Madonna, in fact, sings a bunch of old songs in this show and saying the opposite would make it clear they were not there, they say “Madonna changed the arrangements of the old songs”, “no one recognized them”, or even “no one could sing a fan favorite, ‘Like a Virgin’” because “Madonna ruined it”.
Funnily enough, the good reviews are always based on facts, they are impersonal and do not indicate the writer’s personal feelings towards Madonna. The bad ones always mention her age, what she should or should not be doing on stage at her age, and how long they had to wait until the show started. Sometimes, even worldwide known DJs and producers who open for Madonna are dissed in the haters’s rants. Martin Solveig, for example, became merely “some boring DJ” according to a hater that claims he was at the Madonna show recently. This hater also said that the MDNA show was “the worst concert” of his life.
If you personally like Madonna or not, it doesn’t matter. But when writing about her show, at least, try to be a little impersonal, less emotional and more professional One thing no one can take away from Madonna: the value of her productions, the quality of everything involved in putting her show together, the talents of Madonna and her entire team. So ignoring the production value and just going on a rant on how “bad” the show was in your opinion without any factual piece of information only makes you sound desperate. Madonna still has renowned critics raving about the MDNA TOUR.
But there is one thing that many people are saying (both the haters and some reviewers) that I feel like I must intervene and clarify - not because of the haters, but because of some good reviewers who sometimes, get a little confused, even when writing an extremely positive review, like this one here.
Some people make it sound as if the MDNA TOUR does not have enough “old hits”. When they do mention the old hits played in the current tour, they say ludicrous things like “they are completely rearranged from their original version”. I even read people saying that “they are unrecognizable” - this kind of comment is unfair and bluntly wrong.
So I made a video that compares the original versions of some “old” songs Madonna plays on the MDNA TOUR. Watch it, and tell me if I am wrong:
So for those who insist in saying “Madonna changed the arrangement of her old songs” on a negative tone, let’s face the fact:
Only two old songs in the MDNA TOUR received completely new arrangements:
1) Open Your Heart - which received an acoustic “tribal” Basque treatment, but kept the same melody (which everybody knows).
2) Like a Virgin - which was completely re-invented. Madonna transformed its music and melody.
All the other old songs (and I call “old songs” the ones released before the year 2000) were played in their original arrangement, or as close to their original arrangements as possible. And that includes:
3) Papa Don’t Preach
4) Express Yourself
6) Human Nature
7) Like a Prayer
I could have added two other “old songs” that are also played close to their original formats:
I did not include Holiday and Everybody in that video only because they are not part of the definitive set-list of the show.
However, whenever Madonna decides to play these before-the-year-2000 hits, they are all close to their original, official versions.
So writers and haters, please stop trying to make it sound as if Madonna is making it hard for people to enjoy her old hits based on a single song that received a completely new arrangement (Like a Virgin). The fact is: all the other songs are instantly recognizable. It will be hard for you to attest the opposite with the little video I made as evidence.
So for every hater out there, there are tons of music critics and other celebrities raving about the MDNA Tour, basing their opinions on facts, and not on their butt-hurt egos.
Los Angeles Times: “She’s Madonna, and nobody does this stuff better. Not Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, Britney Spears, Ke$ha, Rihanna, Christina or any of the other generations of pop stars who have used as a model Madonna’s tightly crafted concerts/dance showcases/art projects/spectacles. Some of them may be better singers or more acrobatic, or offer cheaper ticket prices”
LA Weekly says Madonna is “Better than any pop music’s current Madonna-wannabe starlets”. then they name check “[Lady Gaga], Rihanna, Britney, Christina, Pink, J-Lo, Katy Perry, Gwen Stefani, and even edgier artists such as Robyn and Peaches, and recent collaborators MIA and Nicki Minaj” and attest “the entire lot would surely admit to the queen of pop’s influence”.
Examiner.com: Lady Gaga, Kesha, Rihanna, and Katy Perry may be cooler to the younger generation than Madonna these days, but last evening’s show demonstrated how far ahead of the pack Madonna still is. The Queen of Pop’s reign has just been extended.
The fabulous Rose McGowan was there. It seems she is a big fan. Love her even more.
Neil Patrick Harris was there and made a joke on the feud between his friend, the diva Elton John and his co-star (or main star) in the movie The Next Best Thing.
The beautiful Heidi Klum was also there:
All these celebrities will most likely be receiving a free ticket for the Lady Gaga’s Born Reductive High School Musical Ball. We all know how she tries hard…
Members of the Haus of
Gaga Garbage, people close to Lady Gaga are the worst bullies and cyber-offenders in the pop world. They are constantly displaying their intolerance with people who either simply do not like Lady Gaga (excuse me, but people still have the right to have good taste in music), or even just because they outshine Lady Gaga in some respect. They are psychos.
What happened to the “we must intervene when we see bullying happening” speech Lady Gaga gave at the launch of her Born This Way Foundation? She’d better rename it to “Born To Fail Foundation”, as the members of her team clearly did not get the message and herself, for failing to intervene when she sees it happening.
Madonna constantly is the target of nasty, stupid and ignorant tweets by several people close to Lady Gaga’s creative team: @aussiegear, @ladystarlightny, @DJWS, @Terry_World… I mean, how obsessed with Madonna can that entire team be?
You don’t see Madonna’s manager tweeting negative things about Gaga, or Madonna’s producers, or her make-up artists, or her hairstylists or her designers (I guess they are too busy creating stuff, and not thinking of whom to copy). But this constant and predictable Madonna-bashing coming from members of Lady Gaga’s team only proves that they follow every step Madonna takes in the public eye, not to mention that this constant name-checking means they are too butt-hurt too.
At the end, they are, in fact, the living proof that Madonna is always on their minds. Whether they are criticizing her, or praising her (which hasn’t happened yet), they make it more obvious that Madonna is a present force in the “creative minds” of the Haus of Gaga.
The funniest thing is that they cannot take it. Just like Lady gaga herself, the moment they suffer backlash, they victimize themselves and pretend that they are being attacked.
Remember Perry Meek?
The member of the Haus of
Gaga Garbage who called Madonna a “desperate” “has been” and “ignorant old hag” yesterday?
He made his Twitter account “private” today. Some people can dish out, but cannot take it.
I guess he didn’t like having his looks criticized after doing the same with Madonna.
HIS SKIN might look like OLD LEATHER, but he definitely is not “thick” skinned for being such a pussy. His ugly and old looking face and RECEDING BLEACHED-BLOND HAIRLINE don’t help either.
Add to that, the fact that when he called Madonna “a ignorant old hag” he failed to use the correct indefinite article. Hilarious, isn’t it?
And speaking of calling Madonna “desperate”, I wonder what he thinks of his “boss” smoking pot and getting out of a vagina on stage, wearing a meat dress and always victimizing herself in front of teenagers.
Perry Meek is an ugly, stupid, illogical cunt. Just like Lady Gaga herself.
Oh, and this is how he looks after some airbrushing (is he really in a position of calling anyone “old”?):
I love the tweets sent by GagaCheat:
I have one question for Perry Meek. He said “Madonna is a has-been”. I would like him to explain why her MDNA Tour is kicking Lady Garbage’s Born Reductive High School Ball’s ass - both in gross and attendance.
Check what the guy says in the video published by that trashy cunt:
And let’s not forget mega-cunt Laurieann Gibson (@iamboomkack), who used to be Gaga’s creative director (the “head” of the Haus of “Garbage”). Funny that she dissed Madonna in this interview, but later, admitted she purposely made Born This Way and Gaga inspired by Madonna:
You can say whatever you want about Madonna, but she has become the biggest Pop Culture icon in history. And that has a lot to do with her detractors (one doesn’t become such an important cultural icon with a bunch of yes-men around).
Last night, during her “intimate” and “exclusive” “one night only” performance at the Olympia, in Paris, whatever her detractors were looking to accomplish, they ended up demonstrating how relevant Madonna is as a cultural icon.
The reassurance of Madonna’s status as the most important pop icon in the world started even before she stepped on stage last night in Paris.
On the YouTube page her show was broadcast last night, thousands of people clicked on the “dislike” button even before the show began. Yeah, that’s right. Even before Madonna went on stage, thousands of anti-Madonna people took the time to log on to YouTube (increasing the number of people viewing the event) to simply to “dislike” a show that hadn’t even started. And that is the greatest proof of her relevance:
At this day and age, people are so preoccupied with Madonna, that they feel the need to express their distaste/dislike for whatever she is doing, even BEFORE she does anything.
That’s how powerful that woman, as a CULTURAL ICON, is: thousands of people disliked her show on YouTube before it even started, thousands of people took a few minutes of their day to pre-judge something they had no idea what was about. The only thing those people were aware of was their preconceived notion about Madonna - and that is what a true ICON is all about. But that’s not all.
Last night’s event reinforced Madonna’s status as the biggest cultural icon not just because of the thousands of pre-concert disapproving viewers on YouTube. What happened inside the venue is what truly shows how powerful and relevant Madonna is:
A number of concert attendees booed Madonna after they realized the performance was over, and that she wouldn’t be coming back on stage after those nine songs. They booed, they threw bottles at the stage and at the event’s crew (at that time, they were already taking down her light and sound equipment).
The media, as usual, is loving it. Headlines go from “Madonna gets booed-off stage in Paris” to ”Madonna starts riots”. The funniest part of it all is that, however the press twists last night’s events, they fail to mention that by the time the crowd started booing Madonna, she was already halfway through her hotel in Paris.
The truth of the matter is that there was indeed a group of people attending the show looking for trouble. Whether the show was 50-minute long, or she sang two songs (or nine, or 20), they were there to do something “insulting”:
As many photographers captured with their cameras, a group of people in the audience held signs that called Madonna “SALOPE” (“slut” in French), or said things like “Addicted to our $$$” or “Madonna Moi Non Plus” DURING Madonna’s performance.
That is NOT a spontaneous reaction - that is a premeditated, well-planned behavior. So was the booing at the end of her show.
But of course, you don’t see the mainstream media talking about that. They just want you to think that Madonna did something to piss all her die-hard fans in Paris that night without mentioning all the facts.
But at the end, it doesn’t really matter who those people were, and what they wanted. Were they little monsters? Were they Marine Le Pen’s partisans? Who cares?
All that matters is that they made Madonna’s status as a CULTURAL FORCE even bigger.
You see, protests happen around/about icons that share a meaningful relation with the issue being dealt with. For instance, protests regarding the Economy happen in front of economic icons (such as Wall Street); Gay Marriage protests happen in front of iconic places where decisions regarding the issue are made: in front of a Church, or Capitol Hill, for example.
Now, Madonna’s concert is the place where people go to protest against whatever she stands for, whether politically, socially or as a cultural icon.
Extreme Right French people did not like Madonna’s opinion on Xenophobic Marine Le Pen? Lady Gaga fans don’t like the fact that Madonna is (and will always be) the biggest popstar in the world? It doesn’t matter who they were, all we know is that they made a very public statement during Madonna’s concert (in the venue and on YouTube).
At the end of the day, those people simply made a Madonna concert the place to protest whatever position they were discontent with, making Madonna a bigger cultural icon than before.
So yeah! Thank you Madonna detractors for reinforcing her status as the biggest Pop Culture icon of all time.
I got tons of messages telling me Roger Friedman was “fired from Forbes”. But that has yet to be confirmed. I wouldn’t doubt it. Roger Friedman had been fired from FOX NEWS before. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’d happened again. I definitely think Forbes should have let him go a long time ago.
First of all, Roger Friedman is known for obtaining material from illegal sources to write about, which hurts the magazine/network he works for. But besides that, he is also known for being extremely biased on his articles, which always get a sensationalist tone under his name.
While FOX NEWS is a joke on its own (they are sensationalists and liars over there), that is not the profile of Forbes magazine. So I never really understood why Roger Friedman wrote for Forbes online anyway - I guess everyone is trying to cover “celebrities” and “Hollywood” in this day and age.
This celebrity-obsessed editorial line is not really what makes a magazine cheap or careless, it is the content and perspective of editorials they publish that will define the magazine’s position.
Forbes is a business-oriented magazine. And as a magazine that focus on the “business” aspect of everything they write about, they were very unfortunate when they published Roger Friedman’s ridiculous articles on Madonna in 2012.
2012 is the year that Forbes demonstrates through its own publication, that its contributors and its editor-in-chief do not understand a thing about the music industry.
Forbes has already doomed Madonna’s year as a “flop” in their publication. But by the end of the year, Madonna’s name will be splashed all over those end-of-the-year lists as the top earning music star and most successful musician of the year.
And we thought Forbes would know all about business.
Not one person interested in business or economy would take Forbes seriously knowing how short-sighted they were on the articles they published on Madonna in 2012: the year Madonna “flopped”, will be the year she makes more money than any other.
Rule #1: Economy and business do not go well with shortsightedness.
Did I mention that “music business” is called “business” for a reason?
It seems Forbes magazine doesn’t even want Roger Friedman as a freelancer anymore. That’s why his anti-Madonna campaign continues on his blog.
Recently, he said “MDNA is on sale for 0,41 cents on Amazon”. But what is intriguing is that he did not provide a link (or anything else) to prove his statement.
You can go check it for yourselves.
Knowing how much Roger Friedman hates Madonna, if MDNA really were on sale in the regular market for 0,41 cents, he would have provided proof of what he was saying - that would be the icing on the cake. But no, he did not prove it, or provide a link for it. And that, folks, is NOT journalism.
What is the most pathetic of it all is seeing Little Monsters repeating and spreading this piece of information without any proof. Little monsters of all people! The ones who defend Lady Gaga for really selling new units of her album for 0,99 cents on its debut!
FACT: A new (not used) copy of BORN THIS WAY was sold for 0,99 cents for more than one day on its debut week.
Is MDNA being sold for 0,41 cents? No. That’s NOT the price point of the album in the market.
That’s why MTV is NOT talking about it. That’s why Billboard is NOT talking about it.
In fact, the only people talking about it are blogs: blogs written by Lady Gaga fans (Gaga Daily), blogs written by anti-Madonna people like Roger Friedman, and blogs that only report other blogs without the ethics of real journalism - like ONTD and that Grape Juice.
Check Amazon for yourselves. Amazon (the company) is NOT selling MDNA for 0,41 cents at all. You can find people re-selling their copies of MDNA for several different prices on Amazon, but NOT Amazon - not the company.
In fact, I can advertise my copy of “the album of the decade” on Amazon for 0,01 cent and publish an article saying “Born This Way for 0,01 cent on Amazon”.
The price previous owners are reselling their copies of MDNA on Amazon, and NOT Amazon.
See how MISLEADING and MANIPULATIVE that is?
And what is even more pathetic of it all is that the only copies of MDNA being resold by individual owners for 0,41 cents on Amazon (not the company itself), are the ones they received for FREE when they bought tickets for Madonna’s concerts in North America. Check for yourselves:
So Madonna makes the headlines when secondary sellers RESELL her album for a cheap price. How is that different from this?
Lady Gaga’s album, the one that originally cost 0,99 cents is being resold for 0,01 cent. The difference is that she doesn’t have a pseudo-journalist like Roger Friedman writing about it, pretending it is unusual for people to re-sell their stuff on Amazon for a ridiculosuly low price.
Sorry, little monsters, Amazon (the company) sold BTW for less than $1 on its debut week. Not previous owners, not re-sellers. That is a FACT you’re going to have to deal with. Lady Gaga is inferior to Madonna even when it comes to attracting haters and detractors in the mainstream media. Reductive!
Do you know that Madonna is singing BTW in her new show? Gotta love her sense of humor. The funniest part of it is that some little monsters are all over the web saying stuff like "who's reductive now?", isn't it? They don't understand that Madonna is associating those songs forever... they truly are brainless.
Oh, yeah… I don’t expect anything remotely level-headed from those little
By inserting lines of BTW during EXPRESS YOURSELF, Madonna shows the world that the melodic structure and chord progression of those songs are the same.
Madonna is actually making an official statement on the similarities between those songs by mashing them up in the tour that already is on the top 10 most successful tours of all time - before it even started.
Not only that, but Madonna adds lines of another song of hers, titled SHE’S NOT ME.
Meaning: the moment Madonna cites the biggest Madonna-wannabe we have ever seen (Lady Gaga), she sings “SHE’S NOT ME”.
In other words: Madonna sings Madonna, Madonna sings a wannabe, Madonna states “she’s not me”. OWNED.
Lady Gaga can perform naked next week, but she will not gain as many headlines as Madonna telling the world she is not her. Maybe Lady Gaga needs to get back at dressing up like Madonna in purple leotard, or golden corset with cone bra… that’s when the world paid attention to her.
Oh, do not forget: Gaga will address the cancellation of another show this week.
Another member of the Haus of Gaga made another public statement against Madonna. This time, Gaga’s favorite photographer, the repeatedly accused of sexual abuse and harrassment and alleged pedophile Terry Richardson (yeah, that one). This is what he published on his website:
Do not forget that Laurieann Gibson, when she still created and developed Gaga’s performances, made sure we all knew she did not like Madonna.
Which is rather passive-aggressive. After all, a few months later, Gibson publicly admitting she molded Gaga based on Madonna “on purpose”.
Not to mention that other mentor for Lady Gaga, putrid and talentless Lady Starlight, who tweeted:
Ever wonder what the video was about? A trailer trash dude saying he hates Madonna. So yeah, she meant she hated Madonna too (“this pretty much sums it all up for me”).
It’s always been very clear how the members of the Haus of Gaga hated Madonna. The only one who pretends to like her is Lady Reductive. Just like in that movie:
Or, what would be more appropriate:
I simply LOVE how Madonna is sealing this whole BTW/Express Yourself for good. BTW will always be compared to Express Yourself (Gaga really copied its chord progressions and melodic structure). But with the MDNA Tour, Madonna publicly acknowledges, compare them musically and states: “She’s not Me”. Lady Gaga will forever be remembered as the wannabe Madonna sings “She’s Not Me” about.
More reductive than ever.
“Have you heard her albums? Have you seen her? You must be a complete moron to have not seen how much she takes from the 80s in her sound and image.” That person must indeed be an absolute moron. Are they saying, they don’t actually SEE that “Lady Gaga” is …. an 80’s tribute act? Where do these people crawl out of ? Totally uncultured …. like some clueless idiot with no idea about anything …. “Lady Gaga” must have the dumbest fans.
I couldn’t have said it any better.
I think I will feature that anonymous as the Retarded Little
Monster Cunt of the Day.
The previous anon is so dumb, he/she didn’t only admited that lady caca’s tour sucks, but he/she’s also an ignorant fuck that has never heared of the vintage (back from the 90s and the 80s) trend that lady caca is always talking about.
What can we do? Her fans are dumb as a rock.
I don’t think LG could reach a higher level on the media. She is starting to get boring and every thing she does now (no matter how exaggerated is) will be like natural, you know what I mean? Madonna’s career raised step by step, Gaga’s reached the top in only four years and “everything that goes up goes down”.
The main difference is that Madonna is an enigmatic figure. At the same time we [think] we know all about Madonna, we don’t know anything.
Lady Gaga tries to build her persona as an enigma, but at the end, she has already revealed everything she can and cannot do.
As a Halloween figure, there’s only so much Lady Gaga can do. And she’s done it all. She’s worn a meat dress, a bubble outfit, she’s shown us her titties… what’s left? Become a normal girl? We’ve seen her try that too.
Musically, besides silly pop songs, we know she will try to discuss serious stuff in her music too. So she doesn’t have anywhere else to go - grow - from there.
She has already done duets and bar/restaurant performances showing that she might be interested in jazz and more classic stuff. So if she ever decides to record her own album like that, it won’t be a surprise.
We already know she can sit down and drop the performance act façade. We already know she can play more than silly pop songs. We all have seen her as a clown. We have all seen her trying to be sexy. She has already covered and uncovered her body for the cameras. So whenever she decides to drop the Halloween costume, the only real surprising thing left for her to do is to become a far-right conservative cunt.
Madonna, on the other hand, is enthralled in a mythical cloud.
She is about to go on tour, and nobody knows what she’s going to do. Nobody has a clue about a new look, a new theme, a new direction she’s going to take. Whatever she does, she will surprise us all.
Lady Gaga started her tour last month. Nobody had any expectation, and she didn’t deliver anything new. From her outfits, to her performance: everything she did, she had done before. Even her cheesy speech on “how much she loves her little monsters” is old. Lady Gaga’s act is overall tired and old. And if she decided to drop the Halloween costume, there won’t be anything interesting about her.
As for Madonna, she kept us thinking we knew what she could do, and she always came back harder. Nobody knew Madonna could do serious music. When she did it, she did it better than anybody else in pop music. Nobody knew Madonna could do more than a few dance steps on stage, she then set the bar for live concerts that are still copied (20+ years after she did it). When we all thought she could only do big productions, she showed how organic she is as a singer and performer. Madonna hasn’t revealed all her facades yet - and she has been around for 30 years!
I haven’t been following your blog and I have to say I fucking hate you.
Thank you. I know…
“she seems to actually have disdain for her fans (read some books on her)”. I’ve not once got that impression from her. She seems to have a disdain for “silly” people who need their butts kissed like “Gaga” fans. She’s an adult and has an adult relationship with her fans. And I like it that way …. None of the infantile bullshit.
I hear you. And I feel the same way. Madonna is an adult and she has an adult relationship with her fans. It’s authentic and real. Not a calculated move that exploits the fragile and weak egos of an intellectually deficient fan-base (yes, little monsters, I am talking about you).
Lady Reductive makes me want to puke every time she talks to/about her retarded little
“should bring Madonna back to the show”? has she been there?
Oh, man! I was thinking of South Park. I think Madonna has never been on the Simpsons.
The iTunes store is available in 51 countries. Madonna’s MDNA reached the #1 position in 49 countries. #2 in Japan and #3 in Australia (where the album is sold for the regular price 16,99 and not a special pre-order price).
Not only is MDNA a worldwide success, but Madonna’s Celebration compilation album too.
As of this moment, MDNA is #1 in the USA iTunes chart and Celebration climbed up to #4. Not to mention that the amazingly fun and entertaining video for Give me all your Luvin’ is also at the #1 position:
In fact, let’s take a look at this:
Let’s see the current position of both MDNA and Celebration on the iTunes chart:
L-U-V Madonna and her success. And that’s all happening before the Super Bowl. Can you imagine what’s going to happen after her halftime performance?
Haters can eat shit, I mean, CaCa.
I can see your faces down there, you all look like him…
Thanks Pud Whacker.
“David Furnish is a well respected film director. Along with Elton John, David Furnish has been one of the biggest AIDS activists”.
LOL - Those little monsters from that shitty blog are funny.
1) “David Furnish is a well respected film director”.
And what did he direct? Oh, a behind the scenes documentary of an Elton John tour? In the late 90s. Years after the then most watched music documentary in history - Truth or Dare. What recognition did Furnish get for it? Any well established accolades? No? Anyone? Ha!
2) “Along with Elton John, David Furnish has been one of the biggest AIDS activists”.
Elton John, yeah, he has been involved with AIDS activism. And, yes, he is one of the biggest, for sure. Have you seen how big he looks lately? But Furnish? Sorry, he is just an escort that goes accompanying the boss.
Still, Elton’s activism towards gay rights, HIV research centers etc. are modest compared to what Madonna has done over the years. I guess those little monsters don’t know that amongst music stars, Madonna was the biggest support AIDS and HIV support groups had in the 80s/90s.
Elton John and his civil partner, David Furnish are two bad examples for the gay community:
They look unhealthy. They look unhappy. They engage in bad behavior and gossip in public.
Not to mention that Elton John is against gay marriage and that he accepts money from outspoken anti-gay politicians to perform in their marriages. I bet those little monsters didn’t know Elton John performed at Rush Limbaugh’s 4th wedding in 2010. In fact, I bet those little monsters don’t even know who Rush Limbaugh is, much less what he stands for.
And that is the kind of people Lady Caca hangs out:
Unhappy, unhealthy, not admirable people who are against equality, against gay marriage, against happiness. Lady Ga Ga and Elton John share a lot in common, but above all, they are both willing to sell their souls in order to make a few million dollars.
Lady Starlight. Who?
Oh, I see, that’s that mid-30s ugly lady who helped create Lady Ca Ca and a member of her “haus”.
Sorry, Starlight, you are a loser that never achieved anything in your life.
No wonder why you had to post a video in which a piece of white trash metal lover dude says he “hates Madonna” as a response to what Madonna said about your beloved friend. And what was it that Madonna said about Lady Copycat Gag?
Oh! That she is “talented”. Your guys egos are too fragile (as Ga Ga Cheat put it). Madonna simply pointed out that she can see how she has influenced your creation (Gag), and that Caca’s version of “Express Yourself” is “reductive”. Those comments are only “bad” if you consider them a “red flag” for your creativity: after all, you helped develop Gag’s artistry - and that is: copy Madonna, Grace Jones, Elton John, you know… the biggest divas in the industry.
Next time I see a little monster making ageist comments on Madonna, let’s remind them of Lady Starlight, an unattractive 36-year-old loser who has done nothing with her life, besides putting make up on putrid Lady Ca Ca and telling her to imitate Madonna on stage.